Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Motion P1788/M0050:EDP-Without-CA: NO

To: IEEEP1788a <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Motion P1788/M0050:EDP-Without-CA: NO
From: Christian Keil <c.keil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2013 22:06:52 +0200
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <52344837.3070409@louisiana.edu>
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <52284CB5.6070703@kit.edu> <52344837.3070409@louisiana.edu>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

My vote on this motion is NO.

Regards,

	Christian

References:
- new motion
  - From: Ulrich Kulisch
- Motion P1788/M0050:EDP-Without-CA: voting period begins
  - From: Ralph Baker Kearfott

Prev by Date: Re: C language binding of P1888 operations, especially min and max
Next by Date: Re: Motion51 a standard text motion?
Previous by thread: RE: Motion P1788/M0050:EDP-Without-CA: voting period begins
Next by thread: Re: new motion
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread