Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Motion M0052 Expressions: revised text

To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Motion M0052 Expressions: revised text
From: John Pryce <prycejd1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2013 23:44:22 +0000
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

P1788
Following discussions -- mainly with Michel Hack -- I submit the attached revised version of clause 6 as a friendly amendment. It replaces the text originally proposed in motion 52.
Webmaster, please post it on the Motions web page, replacing the current version.
John Pryce

Attachment: 20131104Clause6Expressions.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Prev by Date: Re: Motion 52 -- Time to revive the "Expression" subgroup?
Next by Date: Motion P1788/M0053: Clause 6 Accept new S9 Ops reqd in all flavors - YES
Previous by thread: Motion P1788/M0053: Clause 6 Accept new S9 Ops reqd in all flavors - YES
Next by thread: Re: Motion M0052 Expressions: revised text
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread