Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Motions 51 and 53

To: STDS-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Motions 51 and 53
From: Ned Nedialkov <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2013 08:49:34 -0500
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <7E784419-E60F-4F5F-A65E-74F3AA7D2440@cantab.net>
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <7E784419-E60F-4F5F-A65E-74F3AA7D2440@cantab.net>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

I vote YES on both motions 51 and 53.

Regards,
Ned Nedialkov

References:
- Motions 51 and 53
  - From: John Pryce

Prev by Date: Motion M0053: YES
Next by Date: Motion M0052: Note on my revised text of Nov 4th
Previous by thread: Motions 51 and 53
Next by thread: Motions M0051 and M0053: YES
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread