Re: consenus
Jürgen,
It looks good to me, if there are no objections. Thank you.
Baker
On 11/09/2013 12:18 PM, Jürgen Wolff von Gudenberg wrote:
Baker
I've updated he website. There is a new kind of motion: consensus motion
short (1 week) discussion. and then acceptance, if voting was not
required explicitly in the discussion. I have mapped this as a motion is
that ok?
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
R. Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- consenus
- From: Jürgen Wolff von Gudenberg