Re: Motion 52: final "Expressions" text for vote

["G. William (Bill) Walster" <bill@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Baker,

What I am working on will be used in all applications.

However, until it is finished I do not want to publicly discuss the 
details.  I just don't want what I am doing to fail to be standard 
compliant. :)

Cheers,

Bill


On 11/25/13 12:54 PM, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:
> Bill, P-1788,
>
> On 11/25/2013 02:18 PM, G. William (Bill) Walster wrote:
> .
> .
> .
> > > This does not in any way constrain flavours from extending those
> > > domains in a flavour-specific manner for *non-common evaluations*.
> > It sure does if my universal set of intervals includes the elements of
> > the one-point compactification of the reals, R \cup \infty because 1/0 =
> > \infty.
> > >
>
> Would the one-point compactification actually be used in some
> current application?  If so what?  (I've seen the one-point
> compactification more commonly used in conjunction with the
> complex numbers.)  Are you looking at partial fractions?
>
> Baker