Do I have a second? Re: Bill's new motion
P-1788,
Do I have a second to this motion (appended, in Bill's
email)?
Baker
P.S. This might be a topic of discussion, if this motion
is seconded, but I am wondering if the terms
"mathematically consistent" and "containment constraint"
would need to be made more precise.
On 11/25/2013 04:35 PM, G. William (Bill) Walster wrote:
.
.
.
Section 7 should state that in addition of any flavors described in the
standard, without restrictions, any mathematically consistent interval
system with a containment constraint and published in "Mathematics of
Computation" will also be a valid flavor in the standard.
.
.
.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
R. Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------