Thread Links
Date Links
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Thread Index
Date Prev
Date Next
Date Index
Motion 59
To
: "Corliss, George" <
george.corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>, stds-1788 <
STDS-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Motion 59
From
: Jean-Pierre Merlet <
Jean-Pierre.Merlet@xxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 23:25:21 +0100
Delivered-to
:
mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
BC9627D3-E11B-4516-BA3A-C232E2E14D76@Marquette.edu
>
List-help
: <
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788
>, <
mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788
>
List-owner
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
Organization
: INRIA
References
: <
BC9627D3-E11B-4516-BA3A-C232E2E14D76@Marquette.edu
>
Reply-to
:
Jean-Pierre.Merlet@xxxxxxxx
Sender
:
stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent
: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
I vote yes on motion 59. Happy new year to all!
References
:
P1788: Motions 52, 54, 55, 56, and 57 PASS
From:
Corliss, George
Prev by Date:
P1788 state of play
Next by Date:
Motion P1788/M0059: YES
Previous by thread:
Re: P1788: M59 YES
Next by thread:
My comments on §12.12 (Motions 56 and 57)
Index(es):
Date
Thread