Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Motion P1788/M0059: YES

To: stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Motion P1788/M0059: YES
From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 02:24:33 +0100
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20131231011922.GA14440@xvii.vinc17.org>
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Mail-followup-to: stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20131231011922.GA14440@xvii.vinc17.org>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21-6305-vl-r59709 (2013-04-16)

On 2013-12-31 02:19:22 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> I vote YES on Motion 59, but some clarification is needed.
> See my comments below.
[...]

Grrr... I've just seen that the version on the web site is not the
latest one!

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

References:
- Motion P1788/M0059: YES
  - From: Vincent Lefevre

Prev by Date: Re: Motions 54, 55, 56, 57: YES
Next by Date: Motion P1788/M0059: YES
Previous by thread: Motion P1788/M0059: YES
Next by thread: Motion P1788/M0059: YES
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread