Re: the Endian issue in interchange formats

[Dmitry Nadezhin <dmitry.nadezhin@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I tried to answer to Michel's concern in my previous e-mail
though I put there a misleading Subject field:

http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1788/email/msg07861.html

  -Dima

----- Original Message -----
From: rbk5287@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To: mhack@xxxxxxx, stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, george.corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, prycejd1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, c.keil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 10:48:42 PM GMT +04:00 Abu Dhabi / Muscat
Subject: Re: the Endian issue in interchange formats

P-1788,

I invite discussion on this issue, simultaneous with the voting.
In particular, does anyone object to completely specifying
the interchange format by specifying the endian-ness of the
constituent numbers
(as is done in the version of the P-1788 document now under vote)?

(If there are no objections, there will be some minor clarifying
changes to the document.  If there are objections, we will proceed
to another vote.)

Baker