Re: Michel's comments on interchange representation
Michel,
> Now THAT was news to me, and it certainly is not apparent from the
> document. If we want two separate interchange formats, one for
> sharing among like-minded systems and another for truly global
> sharing, we will need two separate export and import functions,
> and we need to be explicit about it!
If it complicates things,
we can leave in the standard only one export/import function.
Which of them ?
My priority is the truly global sharing,
we can leave sharing between like-minded systems unspecified.
What is your priority ?
-Dima