[no subject]
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 18:31:02 -0700 (PDT), Dmitry Nadezhin wrote:
> May I request you to copy your discussion or its digest to
> the mailing-list? Some previous discussions about interchange
> representation were held privately, and we see now that it was
> wrong. Particulary, I'm curious about your decision about the
> following topics.
I have avoided private discussions for this very reason, as I
announced on June 20:
| I think I want input from a wide range of individuals, which is why
| I'm not just talking to the small group who worked out the current
| definition of interval interchange formats (sections 14.4 and C6.2).
Dima's post points out the questions we need to answer. I'm trying to
merge my initial take with Dima's octets.pdf, but am not quite there yet.
In the meantime suggestions are welcome.
Michel.
---Sent: 2014-06-25 04:00:30 UTC