Re: Comments on the IEEE-SA draft of P1788
John,
Am Mon, 5 Jan 2015 14:15:14 +0000
schrieb John Pryce <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> As I haven't had any response yet I've made the suggested changes, see
> revision 424 on SVN. Please look at the changes to SHALLs, in §9 and
> §10 especially, see if you approve.
there is a mixed up sentence on page 29, line 11: "For each bare interval
constructor shall have...".
> Christian, please see if these change anything in the conformance
> clause.
This shouldn't affect the conformance clause. The conformance clause
refers to these like "an implementation shall do what is said in these
clauses".
Cheers,
Christian