RE: [IEEE 1788]: Post-ballot comment resolution
Definitely no objections to this.
P.S. I apologize for sending this to the entire list, but in the past, that was the usual mode for voting. Let us know if this time, we should only send to you. Vladik
-----Original Message-----
From: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-1788@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ralph Baker Kearfott
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 9:11 AM
To: stds-1788; Jonathan Goldberg
Subject: [IEEE 1788]: Post-ballot comment resolution
First, a comment resolution committee must be formed. The duties of the committee are to decide what to do about the comments.
The comments can be "accepted", "rejected", or "revised," and a formal explanation must be given for any rejected or revised comments. The officers decided that they could be the comment resolution committee, but we need to be sure all of us agree.
In fact, the entire working group can be the comment resolution committee.
I therefore ask if there are any objections to the P-1788 officers constituting the comment resolution committee. (Please respond within several days.)