Re: Status of 1788 revision: interval literals
On 2015-03-04 01:00:38 +0000, John Pryce wrote:
> 2. I'm increasingly doubtful of "promotion" and "demotion" (between
> bare & decorated), see my comments in 9.4.5. I now feel one should
> defer to the language, on whether it is supported. This applies to
> the set-based version too, in 12.11.
I agree (in particular if one has both automatic "promotion" and
"demotion", see my 23 Feb mail).
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)