Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Common interval literals



Dima,

On 2015-03-05 08:37:44 -0800, Dmitry Nadezhin wrote:
> Here is the subsection on Common interval literals with most of your
> comments applied. Thank you for them.
> 
> Additions and changes are in red color.
> Deletions are in red color in square brackets.

Some comments concerning the beginning:

In the first paragraph of §9.4, I would change ", that" to ", which".
See:
  http://web.ku.edu/~edit/which.html
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_relative_clauses#That_or_which

Lines 10-11:
  * "A bare interval literals" -> remove the "s".
  * I wouldn't say "called" as it isn't a naming, the validity is just
    a property. So, I would say:
        A bare interval literal is either /valid/ or /invalid/.
    or
        A bare interval literal can be /valid/ or /invalid/.
  * Add "a" between "has" and "bare".
  * Missing space between "interval" and "value".
  * "an invalid interval literals" -> remove the "s".

There's a spurious black dot between line 28 and line 29.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)