| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
In general, moving large blocks of text and making major changes that are not in response to comments made in the Sponsor Ballot or clear errors makes me nervous about the Recirculation Ballot and REVCOM review processes (but do what is necessary to achieve a high-quality standard). Note that the P-1788 ballot review committee is essentially all of P-1788. Baker On 03/19/2015 12:51 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2015-03-17 17:52:52 +0000, John Pryce wrote:I thought about this. If we change it, I suggest deleting 10.5.1 entirely and moving 12.11 to be a subclause just before 10.5 "Required operations" -- not a sub-sub-clause *of* 10.5. Its references to decorations would then of course be *forward* references, which is one reason I am dubious.But 10.5.1 already had forward references. And 10.5.8 (Constructors) also has forward references to interval literals. A solution might be to move interval literals and constructors to the I/O chapter, which is on the same subject, and check the consequences on the references.
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax) (337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home) URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette (Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street) Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA ---------------------------------------------------------------