Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: P1788.1/M001.01



Dear colleagues,

Seconding Michel's remarks, I'd add that then on line 11, Section 4.6.4 should mention the relationship 1 = true, 0 = false?

Regards,
Rudnei

Em ter, 22 de set de 2015 às 15:09, Michel Hack <mhack@xxxxxxx> escreveu:
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015 19:49:40 +0200
> ... the discussion period now begins and will end October 13.

Ok, so we DO get a chance to discuss!  Two people have voted already, and
I was tempted too, but I might as well bring up two editorial suggestions.

(1)  In table 4.3, show the value of inf(Empty) as +oo, not simply oo.
     The sign of infinity is shown explicitly in other cases.

(2)  In tables 4.4 and 4.6, show the values as True or False, not 1 or 0.
     This would match the definition in 4.1, Level 1 entities.

     The mapping of Booleans to Integers may be language-dependent, and
     some languages actually have explicit Booleans.

Michel.
---Sent: 2015-09-22 18:04:39 UTC