Re: discussion period begins for Motion P1788.1/M002.01: Required operations
Oops; I meant "1788.1-conforming program", not
"1788.1-conforming standard.
Baker
-------------
I previously wrote:
-------------
Ned,
Yes. Along those lines, I view writing "true" and "false" instead of
"1" and "0" as an editorial (explanatory) difference, and not a
substantive difference that would lead to a 1788.1-conforming standard
not being 1788-conforming.
Best regards,
Baker
On 10/14/2015 08:16 AM, Nedialkov, Ned wrote:
All,
I do not have a strong opinion either way. The only comment I would make is to give simplicity
higher priority than formal relations between the two standards.
Regards,
Ned
.
.
.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------