Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
dear p1788 I vote NO for motion 2.1. I'm sharing Oliver's opinion Jürgen Am 23.11.2015 um 07:18 schrieb Oliver
Heimlich:
On 22.11.2015 21:31, Oliver Heimlich wrote:I vote NO on M002.01. Best regards Oliver HeimlichI would like to add my personal rationale: The operations in question are rarely needed in everyday use. They are not as easy to implement and understand as other operations. Also I think that adding these operations will make the gap between P1788.1 and IEEE Std 1788-2015 very small, which in turn 1. weakens the standard (it could be misunderstood as a specification of the full standard for a particular data type) and 2. complicates the simplified version. P1788.1 should not become a flavor of the full standard. This would spoil the idea of having a simplified version. The lesson learned from IEEE 754 is that you can't expect the full standard be implemented everywhere. So let's make it easy to at least implement a simplified standard everywhere. Best regards Oliver |