Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Motion M001.02 -- YES

To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Motion M001.02 -- YES
From: David Lester <dlester@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 17:11:01 +0000
Cc: David Lester <dlester@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <56ACF54E.5020406@nd.edu>
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <201601292348.u0TNmNBm012544@d03av01.boulder.ibm.com> <56ACF54E.5020406@nd.edu>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

I vote yes to M001.02.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Motion M001.02 -- YES
  - From: Chenyi Hu

References:
- Motion M001.02 -- YES
  - From: Michel Hack
- Re: Motion M001.02 -- YES
  - From: Mark Stadtherr

Prev by Date: Re: Motion M001.02 -- YES
Next by Date: Re: Requiring the EDP in 754 (or 1788.1 for that matter)
Previous by thread: Motion M001.02 -- YES
Next by thread: Re: Motion M001.02 -- YES
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread