Re: Motion P1788.1/M004.01
On Fri, 13 May 2016 09:34:32 -0500, George Corliss wrote:
> I submit that this entire thread of discussion, while interesting,
> has no bearing on P1788.1, since our standard is based on 1788.
I disagree -- it is definitely germane to 1788.1 because Ulrich raised
the issue of 1788.1 (unlike 1788) being "based on 754-2008", and Lee
Winter raised the issue of the existence of unbounded intervals. The
kinds of unbounded intervals that must exist in 1788.1 are only a subset
of those that must exist in the full standard. I think it is possible
to have a 1788.1 where Entire is the only unbounded interval, for example.
But that one is definitely required, as the proposal stands right now.
Michel.
---Sent: 2016-05-13 14:41:22 UTC