Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: Difficulties in implementation of textToInterval(s)

To: Dmitry Nadezhin <dmitry.nadezhin@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Difficulties in implementation of textToInterval(s)
From: John Pryce <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 15:16:35 +0000
Cc: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <b8031bb1-138f-420e-a947-3dafdd2c1421@default>
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <b8031bb1-138f-420e-a947-3dafdd2c1421@default>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

Dmitry
> On 21 May 2016, at 13:13, Dmitry Nadezhin <dmitry.nadezhin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So the operation textToInterval(s) for some inputs is more expensive in P1788.1 than in P1788.
> Is it intentional project decision of P1788.1 ?
Thanks for pointing this out. Ned, what say you?
John Pryce

References:
- Difficulties in implementation of textToInterval(s)
  - From: Dmitry Nadezhin

Prev by Date: Re: Difficulties in implementation of textToInterval(s)
Next by Date: Difficulties in implementation of textToInterval(s)
Previous by thread: Difficulties in implementation of textToInterval(s)
Next by thread: Re: Difficulties in implementation of textToInterval(s)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread