Re: P1788.1: PLEASE VOTE: Motion P1788.1/M004.02
My vote is YES.
Oliver
On 17.06.2016 11:27, Corliss, George wrote:
> P1788.1,
>
> Motion M004.02 voting continues through June 21. Nathalie’s announcement is below.
>
> Current tally: Yes: 27; No: 4; Needed for quorum: 29.
>
> 12 Voting Members have not yet voted. Several of those usually wait until the last couple days to cast their votes.
>
> PLEASE VOTE if you have not already done so.
>
> When the voting is complete, I will compile and circulate the comments that accompanied the “NO” votes.
>
> George Corliss
> P1788.1 Voting Tabulator
>
>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> From: Nathalie Revol <Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Voting period begins, until June 21, for Motion P1788.1/M004.02
>> Date: June 1, 2016 at 12:00:27 PM CDT
>> To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Nedialkov, Ned" <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Nathalie Revol <Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>>
>> Dear Colleagues
>>
>> voting period for Motion M004.01 begins today (I implicitely extended the discussion
>> period, as discussions were most lively last week). It ends on June 21.
>>
>> As we want to have a simplified version of IEEE 1788-2015, I suggest that we vote
>> on the text of Motion M004.02 (see attached file), which is Motion M004.01 amended
>> as follows:
>> (cf. mail by Ned Nedialkov, May 24)
>> ——
>> I suggest in 6.6.2 in the first item to add the text “of the same radix (10 or 16)”. The first sentence
>> would read then
>>
>> "A string [l,u] where l and u are optional number literals of the same radix (10 or 16) with l ≤ u, l < +∞ and u > −∞, see 4.2. “
>> ——
>>
>> If you are no more on the voting list and want to be reinstantiated, please send me a message.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Nathalie Revol
>>