Motion P1788.1/M004.02: YES
I vote YES on the text of "6. Level 2 description", but with two
editorial comments:
Page 21 Line 9 (in 6.6.2): Delete "These number literals must be of the same"
(This was an incomplete sentence; the substantive statement is on
the preceding line 8.)
Page 22 Line 7 (in 6.7.6): add "as defined by 754-2008" after "closest to x".
(Unqualified "closest to x" could me misleading when x is finite
but out of b64 range, as the largest representable magnitude Max
could be seen as closer than infinity for any finite x, yet 2008-754
specifies that the rounding threshold for nearest(x)=Inf is Max+ulp/2.)
Michel.
---Sent: 2016-06-19 13:48:25 UTC