Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Motion P1788.1/M004.02: NO

I agree. The simplified standard should be a flavour of the full standard. I do appreciate all the work that's gone into it and hope this can be resolved.

- Ian McIntosh IBM Canada Lab Compiler Back End Support and Development


Inactive hide details for Evgenija Popova ---2016-06-20 11:41:11 AM---I vote NO. In my opinion producing two non-conforming intEvgenija Popova ---2016-06-20 11:41:11 AM---I vote NO. In my opinion producing two non-conforming interval standards will be a

From: Evgenija Popova <epopova@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Ian McIntosh/Toronto/IBM@IBMCA
Date: 2016-06-20 11:41 AM
Subject: Motion P1788.1/M004.02: NO




I vote NO.

In my opinion producing two non-conforming interval standards will be a
bad message for the end-users.

I would vote YES if P1788.1 was in conformance (flavor) to IEEE Std
1788-2015.

Evgenija Popova

--
Institute of Mathematics and Informatics
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences