| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
P1788.1, Voting on Motion M007.01 concluded on Thursday, 26 January. Nathalie’s call is below. Final tally: Yes - 35; No - 0; Needed for quorum - 29. The motion PASSES. Comments during the voting at below. George Corliss P1788.1 Voting Tabulator > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "Kreinovich, Vladik" <vladik@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: Motion M007.01: voting period begins, until January 26 > Date: January 5, 2017 at 5:15:31 PM CST > To: Nathalie Revol <Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: "Nedialkov, Ned" <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx>, John Pryce <prycejd1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I vote for. > > My minor concern is with the title of the appendix: Not required features. I am not a native speaker, but when I was learning English, my teacher would correct me if I would write something like that, maybe we should reword it or at least add a dash between not and required? Or maybe it is legit and/or iat least is legit in standards? > Begin forwarded message: > > From: John Pryce <PryceJD1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Motion M007.01: voting period begins, until January 26 > Date: January 8, 2017 at 4:52:11 PM CST > To: Vladik Kreinovich <vladik@xxxxxxxx>, Stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Ned Nedialkov <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > I also vote for, but I agree with Vladik that "Not-required" seems clearer. An alternative is the single English word "Unneeded". Ned, does it have the intended meaning in this context? I hope this small change can be a friendly amendment. > John Pryce > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "Nedialkov, Ned" <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Motion M007.01: voting period begins, until January 26 > Date: January 10, 2017 at 9:27:43 AM CST > To: John Pryce <prycejd1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Vladik Kreinovich <vladik@xxxxxxxx>, Stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx> > >> On Jan 8, 2017, at 17:52, John Pryce <prycejd1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> I also vote for, but I agree with Vladik that "Not-required" seems clearer. > > > Yes, will update to No-required. > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Andreas Rauh <andreas.rauh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Motion 007.01: YES > Date: January 9, 2017 at 1:22:27 AM CST > To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Dear colleagues, > > my vote is YES. I agree with the rewording suggestion made by Vladik and John. > > Best regards > Andreas > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Michel Hack <mhack@xxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: Motion 007.01: YES > Date: January 20, 2017 at 3:05:27 PM CST > To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > I vote Yes for the proposed Level3/Level4 section of the document. > > I concur with the editorial suggestions about replacing "Not required". > One suggestion was "Unneeded" -- but perhaps we could be precise and say: > > Features of the full standard not required in the 1788.1 standard. > > Another editorial fix for a typo on line 3 of page 28: > in parenthesis. -> in parentheses. > > Michel. Begin forwarded message: From: Dmitry Nadezhin <dmitry.nadezhin@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Motion M007.01: YES Date: January 23, 2017 at 9:39:13 AM CST To: <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx> My vote for this motion is YES. I would suggest to insert a sentence at line 2 of page 28 (Annex A) if it is not too late. "IEEE P1788.1 satisfies all General Requirements of IEEE Std 1788-2015 and hence it can be considered a flavor of that standard. This Annex lists all features of the set-based flavor of IEEE Std 1788-2015 that are not ...." Best Regards, -Dima > Begin forwarded message: > > From: "Kreinovich, Vladik" <vladik@xxxxxxxx> > Subject: RE: Motion M007.01: YES > Date: January 23, 2017 at 9:46:55 AM CST > To: Dmitry Nadezhin <dmitry.nadezhin@xxxxxxxxxx>, "stds-1788@xxxxxxxx" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx> > > I don't think it is a flavor, many things from 1788 are on purpose omitted here, this was, in my understanding, the whole purpose, maybe I am missing something > Begin forwarded message: From: Dmitry Nadezhin <dmitry.nadezhin@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: Motion M007.01: YES Date: January 23, 2017 at 10:52:42 AM CST To: <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx> Vladik, 1788 consists of two parts: - general requirements common for all flavors; - set-based flavor. Many things of set-based flavor are omitted. All 1788 general requirements are in the 1788.1. Or maybe I missed some requirement ? -Dima > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Nathalie Revol <Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Motion M007.01: voting period begins, until January 26 > Date: January 5, 2017 at 5:00:39 PM CST > To: Stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx> > Cc: Nathalie Revol <Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Nedialkov, Ned" <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx>, John Pryce <prycejd1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Dear Colleagues, > > I wish you all the best for 2017. > > It is now time to vote on Motion M007.01, until January 26. > > Best regards > Nathalie Revol > >> On 22 Nov 2016, at 16:18, Nathalie Revol <Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> Dear Colleagues, >> >> Motion M007.01 has been moved by Ned Nedialkov and seconded by John Pryce: >> its content is that the last part, Level 4, and Annex A of P1788.1 are accepted. >> The related text is attached. >> >> Thank you to Ned and John. >> >> The discussion period begins and will end on December 13, 2016. >> >> Best regards >> Nathalie Revol >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> Nathalie Revol INRIA Grenoble - Rhone Alpes >> LIP - projet AriC tel: (33) 4 72 72 85 03 >> Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon fax: (33) 4 72 72 80 80 >> 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__perso.ens-2Dlyon.fr_nathalie.revol_&d=DgIFAg&c=S1d2Gs1Y1NQV8Lx35_Qi5FnTH2uYWyh_OhOS94IqYCo&r=zbKTKV51PGVwSJ8WG7DcOhnGyecdLP4osK_mdwDQbgU&m=0Z0FxFmDtqjTXm-Zy0AOdxQuDN1DLKeSxk0a694ZTAY&s=yF-5TJpMYBMHt-AP6tXyNaGDofHE5d6eqSYBTHGazaQ&e= >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Nathalie Revol INRIA Grenoble - Rhone Alpes > LIP - projet AriC tel: (33) 4 72 72 85 03 > Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon fax: (33) 4 72 72 80 80 > 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__perso.ens-2Dlyon.fr_nathalie.revol_&d=DgIFAg&c=S1d2Gs1Y1NQV8Lx35_Qi5FnTH2uYWyh_OhOS94IqYCo&r=zbKTKV51PGVwSJ8WG7DcOhnGyecdLP4osK_mdwDQbgU&m=0Z0FxFmDtqjTXm-Zy0AOdxQuDN1DLKeSxk0a694ZTAY&s=yF-5TJpMYBMHt-AP6tXyNaGDofHE5d6eqSYBTHGazaQ&e= > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > >
Attachment:
level4.pdf
Description: level4.pdf