Re: P1788: Next?
Natalie,
> it is not clear to me that 1788.1 is a flavor of 1788…
Part 1 "General Requirements" of the 1788 standard defines requirements for a flavor.
Which of these requirements are not met by 1788.1 ?
Best Regards,
-Dima
----- Original Message -----
From: Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx, george.corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, STDS-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 8:53:22 PM GMT +03:00 Iraq
Subject: Re: P1788: Next?
Yes, Ned, please incorporate the minor comments from the last vote.
I do not think we need to vote on them, as they are really minor.
Except the one concerning the “flavor”: it is not clear to me that 1788.1 is a
flavor of 1788… Shall we discuss this point?
If no, then we can start the discussion + vote on the whole document.
Ned, can you move it?
Best regards
Nathalie
> On 31 Jan 2017, at 16:14, Nedialkov, Ned <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I should include the minor comments from the last vote. Shall we vote on them?
> Then shall we vote on the whole document? We have accepted all parts.
>
> Regards,
> Ned
>> On Jan 31, 2017, at 09:54, Corliss, George <george.corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> P1788,
>>
>> What are our next steps?
>>
>> Let’s FINISH this.
>>
>> George Corliss
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nathalie Revol INRIA Grenoble - Rhone Alpes
LIP - projet AriC tel: (33) 4 72 72 85 03
Ecole Normale Superieure de Lyon fax: (33) 4 72 72 80 80
69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France Nathalie.Revol@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://perso.ens-lyon.fr/nathalie.revol/
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------