Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: P1788: Next?

To: Dmitry Nadezhin <dmitry.nadezhin@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ned Nedialkov <nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: P1788: Next?
From: John Pryce <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2017 16:37:23 +0000
Cc: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <3e5ff887-cff4-45c7-9d8a-41dbbf6c5335@default>
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <3e5ff887-cff4-45c7-9d8a-41dbbf6c5335@default>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

Dmitry, Ned
> On 9 Feb 2017, at 15:10, Dmitry Nadezhin <dmitry.nadezhin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ned,
> Part 1 of the 1788 defines the standard as a family of flavors.
> Part 2 defines the particular set-based flavor.
But does 1788.1 currently allow mixed radix literals or not?
John P

Prev by Date: Re: P1788: Next?
Next by Date: Re: P1788: Next?
Previous by thread: Re: P1788: Next?
Next by thread: Re: P1788: Next?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread