IEEE 802.11TM  TG ”p” Technical Letter Ballot 125 Instructions



These instructions apply only for IEEE 802.11 Letter Ballot 125 (LB125) which is a technical vote on Draft 4.0 of the Task Group “p” amendment to the current IEEE 802.11 standard.


Important notes:

  • This is a technical letter ballot and the voter’s pool for this ballot is all IEEE 802.11 voters as of the start of the letter ballot. All current voting members of 802.11 are required to vote on this ballot.

  • If you cast a "Do not approve" vote on this ballot, it must be accompanied by comments for your vote to be valid.

  • You must follow the instructions below to vote.  Do not send an email to vote.  Voting by any method other than the web-based process described below will invalidate your vote.

  • Failure to follow these instructions will result in your vote being discarded as an invalid vote.

  • Not voting on letter ballots or sending an invalid vote can affect your voting privileges.


This technical ballot opens Thu April 3, 2008 at 23:59 Eastern Time USA and closes 30 days later on Sat May 3, 2008 at 23:59 Eastern Time USA.



Motion: Should Draft P802.11p D4.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?


Type of Motion: Technical


To Obtain the draft and the supporting documentation: 





Draft P802.11p_D4.0.pdf
Redlined Doc Supporting Documents



Comment Template
Pool LB# 125 Voters
CA Document



The draft is password protected per IEEE 802 Policies and Procedures.  To obtain the draft, use the username and the password supplied to voting members for the 802.11 WG private area.



Cast Your Vote Here  and follow the instructions below:


You will see the following web page.


Note:  All fields, except for the FAX field, are required  in order for your vote to be valid.


Please fill out the balloter information that is requested.





  Balloter ID

Can be found on your name badge from the last plenary session



Fill in your complete name



Enter the email address you would like the ballot response sent to



Enter where you can be contacted (if needed)



Not required



Click on the drop down box and select from of the following:
Approve (no comments)
Approve (with comments)
Do Not Approve (with comments)
Abstain due to lack of technical expertise



Enter your Affiliation



Once the information above is completed, Click the “Submit Button” to   enter your vote






You will also receive a confirmation web page for your vote.


If you are submitting comments, click on the “Submit Comments” button.






This will take you to a page that looks similar to this:

Select ONLY #2 - “File Upload”


Once selected, Click the “Continue to the Submit Comments Area”.

This takes you to the page below:



File Upload Instructions


  Select “Browse…

  Select your completed comment file.


  File Description

  Enter the file type in the “File Description” field.


  Comment Information

  Complete the “Commenter Information” as before in these instructions.


  Comment Type

  Select either “Technical” if any technical comments are included or editorial for all else.


  Upload file now

  Once the information above is correct the "Upload file now" button



Email Confirmation:

You will automatically receive an email confirmation of your vote.


(Message sent via IEEE Standards webmail)


Here is a courtesy copy of a ballot for IEEE 802.11 k Letter Ballot 86 just submitted:


# Ballot/Comment Data for 0000001 (IEEE 802.11 k Letter Ballot 86) # Submitted

Tue Aug  8 21:47:29 EDT 2006 # Type: ballot # Record Number: 112


ballot_code = 0000001

form_type = ballot

balloter_id = 112

name = John Doe

email =

phone = 555-555-5555

fax =

org = XYZ

vote = Approve, no comments (Y)


(End of IEEE Standards webmail message)



Completing the Comment Form:

Should you wish to submit comments, please use the following instructions:


0)   Form:  The official comment form for Letter Ballot 125 must be used.  This comment form is available at



Names: In the header of comment response form, please fill in your name in the <First Name>, <Last Name> fields.  Do not use your initials or anything else. And don't include the angled brackets around your name.


Clause Column: This is the section number of the draft that your comment applies to - e.g. 2.1 or 4.2.3.  If you have a comment that applies to the entire document put "General" in the section field. Don’t put “all”, “many”, “various” or any other word you may personally fancy. If the field contains anything other that a clause number or “General”, the comment will be discarded and your vote possibly invalidated.  If your comment relates to a table/figure, place the clause in which the table/figure resides in this column and put a reference to the table/figure at the start of the comment.  Put only the clause number and not the words, e.g. “clause”.


"Page No. / Line No." Column: If you choose to include a page / line number reference in your comments, please do so by entering it in these columns. Do not put this info in the clause number field. The rational is that the page/line numbers are valid only for the balloted draft version.  Clause numbers are more likely to still be correct in later versions.


"Comment Type (E or T)" Column: Please use an E or T only to indicate a technical or an editorial comment. Please use upper case only so things sort right when we get all done.  Incorrectly categorized comments will be re-categorized by the Task Group chair.


"Part of No vote” Column: If you say "no" in this column, we will feel free to skip that comment in terms of formally satisfying a "NO" vote. For any comment that is not part of your “NO” vote, mark it as "not part of a no vote" by entering “N” in the column. Any voter that votes “NO” should have at least one comment marked “yes” as part support for their “NO” vote.  Any voter that votes “YES” should not have any comments marked “Y” in this column.


"Comment / Explanation" and "Recommended Change" columns: These are pretty self explanatory. If you do not recommend a change the comment may be skipped as you have not asked the group to do anything. Please keep the explanation of the comment separate from what you want done as a result of your reasoning. The voting group is too large for the task group to be interpreting what you are requesting.   Please remember that the operating rules state that all “No” votes MUST be accompanied by comments which include specific reasons and enough information for the group to understand what you desire in order to change your “no” to a “yes”. Simply saying “not good enough” is insufficient as the task group cannot reasonably be expected to understand what would satisfy the commenter and so invalidation of the vote is justifiable.


Redline drafts:  The redline draft (if present) is there to show differences between a version being balloted in the current ballot and a previous version.   Due to limitations of the tools used to produce the redline,  this version of the draft may contain artifacts arising from the comparison process.  Before reporting a comment against a problem found in a redline draft *always* check that it is also present in the clean draft.  Regardless of the above, always report any page and line numbers from the clean draft.



Bruce Kraemer

IEEE 802.11TM Working Group Chair





Adrian Stephens

IEEE 802.11TM Working Group Vice Chair / Balloting Coordinator





Lee Armstrong

IEEE 802.11TM Task Group "p" Chair





April 2, 2008