Hi Jinyoung,
Thanks for deferring this CID, and providing the explanation. But an EHT STA can support HT/VHT/HE/EHT PPDU, so no reason to disallow HT/VHT variant of HT control. So I don’t agree
with the comment.
Regards,
Yunbo
发件人: Jinyoung Chun [mailto:jiny.chun@xxxxxxx]
发送时间: 2022年11月16日
19:37
收件人: STDS-802-11-TGBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Liyunbo <liyunbo@xxxxxxxxxx>; aajami@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
主题: [STDS-802-11-TGBE] RDG/More PPDU subfield (CID 11827)
Hi, Yunbo and Abdel,
RDG/More PPDU subfield is in HT control for HT/VHT variant, and in CAS control among A-Control for HE variant as below.
The target STA in a MU-RTS TXS Trigger frame, that is newly defined, is an EHT STA. So RDG/More PPDU subfield for the target STA in a MU-RTS TXS Trigger
frame is present in the CAS Control subfield as below resolution.
|
CID |
Commenter |
PP.LL |
Comment |
Proposed Change |
Resolution |
|
11827 |
9.2.4.6.1 |
122.04 |
This new interpretation is only valid when the RDG/More PPDU bit is included in the CAS Control. Add a note to the table specifying that the Target STA case is present
when bit is in CAS control as defined in x.y. |
As in comment. |
Revised Agree with the commenter and just add note below. For your information, other explain about the subfield is described in REVme as below: ‘In a non-HE HT STA, the RDG/More PPDU subfield and the AC Constraint
subfield are present in the HTC field. In an HE STA, the RDG/More PPDU subfield and the AC Constraint subfield are present in the CAS Control subfield.’ To TGbe Editor:
Please add the note below the Table 9-17. ‘NOTE: RDG/More PPDU subfield for the target STA in a MU-RTS TXS Trigger frame is present in the CAS Control subfield (See 9.2.4.6a.7 (CAS Control)). |
If you have other opinion, please let me know.
Best regards,
Jinyoung
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBE list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBE&A=1