Hi, Zinan
I am ok with this version as well. It is more clearly described.
I just wanted to mean two bits are not necessary to indicate the I_ng parameter, unless we want to keep one more bits
for the forward compatibility like for the next generation Sensing.
Regards
Junghoon
From: Zinan Lin [mailto:000019c80da359b9-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: July 26, 2022 12:24 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBF] Updated PDT
Hi Steve,
Thank you very much for presenting 11-22/1020r2.
Attached please find my suggestions on Table A, which also incorporates Junghoon’s suggestion to put NOTE in the column of Ing meaning.
Please take a look at the document.
Best,
Zinan
From: stds-802-11-tgbf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
stds-802-11-tgbf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Behalf Of Steve Shellhammer
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2022 12:01 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Updated PDT
|
Hi Tony, With help from a number of people I have updated the following PDT and would like to review it on the Task Group call. 11-22/1020r2 “PDT Formatting
of CSI”, Steve Shellhammer (20 minutes) Regards,Steve To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the |
|
|
Hi Tony,
With help from a number of people I have updated the following PDT and would like to review it on the Task Group call.
11-22/1020r2 “PDT Formatting of CSI”, Steve Shellhammer (20 minutes)
Regards,
Steve
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1