| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi, Tony It is still 22/1224r1, because the motion will be run on the selective CRs in the document 1224r1 with those two CIDs, 65 and 119 left out. Thank you Regards Junghoon From: Hanxiao (Tony, WT Lab) [mailto:0000177ab8f731c4-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Please help to confirm the document number is 22-1224r1, or 22-1224r2? Best Regards : ) Tony Xiao
Han 发件人: Junghoon Suh [mailto:000017d35818e7c0-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Hello, Tony The Motion 126 supposed to be run on 30 Aug. needs to be updated as following.
§
Move to approve resolutions to the following CIDs listed in the following document and incorporate the text changes into the latest TGbf
draft:
·
CIDs 65, 119, 123, 124, 136, 193, 194, 477, and 550
·
as specified in 11-22-1224r1 should be updated to
§
Move to approve resolutions to the following CIDs listed in the following document and incorporate the text changes into the latest TGbf
draft:
·
CIDs 123, 124, 136, 193, 194, 477, and 550
·
as specified in 11-22-1224r1 The CIDs 65 and 119 are related with the “Sensing Measurement Report Type” field length which is supposed to be 3 bits but fixed here in the original resolution
to 1 byte. Hence, these two CIDs are removed from the motion and we need to run the motion on the remaining CIDs, 123, 124, 136, 193, 194, 477, and 550 only. As for the CIDs 65 and 119, the new resolution document will be prepared and presented soon. Thank you Regards Junghoon From: Junghoon Suh [mailto:000017d35818e7c0-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Hello, Tony Let me request the following motion.
§
Move to approve resolutions to the following CIDs listed in the following document and incorporate the text changes into the latest TGbf draft:
·
CIDs 65, 119, 123, 124, 136, 193, 194, 477, and 550
·
as specified in 11-22-1224r1 Thank you Regards Junghoon Suh From: Steve Shellhammer [mailto:sshellha@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Hi Tony, I would like to request the following motion.
·
Move to include the text proposed in the following document into the IEEE 802.11bf draft amendment:
o
22/1020r5 PDT Formatting of CSI Straw Poll Result: Unanimous consent Regards, Steve To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1 |