Hi Dongguk,
Thanks for the sharing.
I have the following suggestions:
1.
Regarding the following table, Poll, Sounding, Report are called different
Sensing Trigger frame variant. However, in the text of the CR document, they are called
Poll sub-variant, Sounding sub-variant, and Report
sub-variant of the Sensing Trigger frame. This is confusing to me because of the consistency.
|
Sensing Trigger Subtype field value |
Sensing Trigger frame variant |
|
0 |
Poll |
|
1 |
Sounding |
|
2 |
Report |
|
3-15 |
Reserved |
2.
I know maybe you don’t want to touch the Frame A and Frame C in the Topic Threshold in this CR document (See the figure below).
However, since the above two frames are highly related to the variant designs. Could you add some descriptions saying that it’s TBD whether the Sensing
Trigger A and C in 11.21.18.6.5 Threshold-based reporting phase are different subvariants of the Sensing Report Trigger frame, or whether
the Sensing Trigger A is another new variant of the Sensing Trigger frame? Otherwise, the variant design seems to be a little bit confusing, because actually Sensing
Trigger A and B are two different types and now the design doesn’t consider these two types. Thanks.
Best regards,
Mengshi Hu
发件人: Dongguk Lim <dongguk.lim@xxxxxxx>
发送时间: 2022年9月6日
9:46
收件人: Osama AboulMagd <Osama.AboulMagd@xxxxxxxxxx>; dibakar.das@xxxxxxxxx; Mahmoud.Kamel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; alirezar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; humengshi <humengshi@xxxxxxxxxx>; rajat.pushkarna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
rojan.chitrakar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dongxiandong@xxxxxxxxxx; 'HUANG LEI' <huang.lei1@xxxxxxxx>; 'Claudio da Silva' <claudiodasilva@xxxxxx>; Hanxiao (Tony, WT Lab) <tony.hanxiao@xxxxxxxxxx>; narengerile <narengerile@xxxxxxxxxx>; STDS-802-11-TGBF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
抄送: hg.cho@xxxxxxx; js.choi@xxxxxxx; insun.jang@xxxxxxx; sanggook.kim@xxxxxxx
主题: Discusssion for the Sensing Trigger frame
Dear All,
I hope you had a nice holiday.
I knew that some members would like to discuss this topic by scheduling additional meetings. However, since we have scheduled many CCs for the discussion of other topics this week, it is
hard to schedule another CC for this discussion for the sensing Trigger frame. in addition, the 802.11 Interim sessions are scheduled for next week.
Thus, first of all, I would like to discuss the sensing Trigger topic by using the email discussion to gather opinions for other members.
I revised the CR document for the sensing Trigger frame based on the Comments received during the last CC.
For the indication of this modification, I add the memo in the attached document and add also some discussion points using the memo.
Attached, Please take look at it. I look forward to the good comments from you.
Best regards,
Dongguk.
________________________________________________________________________________________
Dongguk Lim
Chief Technology Officer IoT Connectivity Standard Task/Professional
LG Electronics Inc
19, Yangjae-daero 11-gil, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea
M.82-10-8996-4690
E.dongguk.lim@xxxxxxx
___________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBF list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBF&A=1