| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Hi Sanket,
Thank you for your reply.
When I mention "AC may have different meanings for differenet APs", I was referring to scenarios like the following:
For example, AP1's AC_VI EDCA parameters can be more aggressive than those of AP2's AC_VO
or AP1's AC_VI traffic can have more demanding latency requirement than AP2's AC_VO traffic.
In that case, effect of exchanging traffic profile (limited to allocation duration and interval) of ACs or even providing Primary AC in polling ICF fades.
On possible solution will be including information about the urgency of traffic (e.g., delay bound) in Traffic Profile field.
Best Regards,
Jungjun
--------- Original Message ---------
Sender : Sanket Kalamkar <000033b8f79f2eb4-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date : 2025-07-25 23:28 (GMT+9)
Title : Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] (2) [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-MAC-CR-Co-TDMA Part 3
Hi Jungjun,
Thanks for the feedback.
In order to correctly address your comment, could you please clarify what you mean by "AC having different meanings at different APs"? Also, what further information about AC are you referring to?
Best,
Sanket
From: Jungjun Kim <jungjun.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2025 1:37 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] (2) [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-MAC-CR-Co-TDMA Part 3
WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros. Hi Sanket, Thank you for preparing the document. I would also like to share a suggestion on the PDT. For Per-AC Traffic Info field, an AC may have different meanings for differenet APs in terms of QoS characteristics or channel access probability. In this context, I think it would be better for a reqeuseting AP to include some more information about ACs. Best Regards Jungjun Kim
--------- Original Message --------- Sender : 援ъ’낇 <jh89.koo@xxxxxxxxxxx> Connectivityν쒖€Lab(SR)/μ궪μ꽦μ 꾩 Date : 2025-07-25 17:21 (GMT+9) Title : Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] PDT-MAC-CR-Co-TDMA Part 3
Hi Sanket,
Thanks for working on the Co-TDMA negotiation details. Attached please find my comments and suggestions. Summary of my comments are as follows:
1. We may need to specify the condition to the value of the Rx TXOP Return Support field to 1 in consideration of the Co-TDMA negotiation results (specifically, Rx TXOP Return Support field setting during the Co-TDMA negotiation) with any polled APs in a Co-TDMA ICF.
2. It seems more appropriate if Traffic Control field is included in the MAPC Request Parameter Set field rather than the MAPC Scheme Parameter Set field.
3. It would be much better if we specify reasons to allow multiple Traffic Profiles per AC.
4. Suggest to have βLengthβ field in the Traffic Profile field for future extensibility.
5. Suggest not to prevent using βAlternateβ MAPC Operation Type for future extensibility.
Hi Sanket,
Thanks for your work on Co-TDMA PDT. How about to including βAP TB PPDU Response Supportedβ into the Co-TDMA Info field? This information seems to be only used for Co-TDMA, isnβt it?
Best Regards, GeonHwan Kim LG Electronics
WARNING: This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1 |
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1