Dear Jason,
One more comment attached, and reported here
Since you defined a format, the sentence I crossed seems unnecessary. What I feel is necessary in this subclause (and align with the text for other schemes) is the addition of
the new text above that:
- Shall include Co-SR profile
- The CO-SR profile shall include ONE MAPC Shceme Request field
This apply to the Co-BF PDT too.
Best,
Giovanni
From: Giovanni Chisci <00002b657bbbbed7-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2025 8:00 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] CBF/CSR MAC PDTs
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
Dear Jason,
Thanks for the revision.
Some additional comments attached (provided for Co-SR but apply also to Co-BF).
Mainly alignment with the MAPC framework and other schemes negotiation sections.
Best,
Giovanni
From: Guoyuchen (Jason Yuchen Guo) <000018696e95f088-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2025 6:45 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] CBF/CSR MAC PDTs
WARNING:
This email originated from outside of Qualcomm. Please be wary of any links or attachments, and do not enable macros.
Dear TGbn members,
I have updated the document for
Co-BF.
The major change is I created a separate subclause 37.13.2.1.3 (Common transmission procedure for Co-BF and Co-SR) for the common transmission procedure of Co-BF and Co-SR
Any comment is welcome.
Best,
Jason Yuchen Guo
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1