Re: [STDS-802-11-TGBN] 11bn LB291 CR request

[全映桥 (Yingqiao Quan) <000048eb7d39711e-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Ross，

 

Thank you for updating the Version5 of comments sheet for LB291.

 

If I remember correctly, we had some discussions about the usage of “an MAPC” or “a MAPC” during the last conference call, but no final conclusion was reached.

But there is a resolution for CID 7648 R4M in 11/25-1772r5 which shows

 

REVISED
An MAPC should be used.

TGbn editor: please make the changes as the resolution of CID 9635 in 11/25-1791r1.

 

 

Since the resolution of CID 9635 is deferred in 11/25-1791r1, I think the resolution of CID 7648 is invalid and should be deferred too.

And not to mention that “a MAPC” is actually accepted by more people.

 

BR，

 

Yingqiao Quan

Communication Standards Devision

 

 

 

 

From: Yujian (Ross Yu) <00001792b51ef4ea-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2025 9:16 AM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBN@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: 11bn LB291 CR request

 

注意: 这封邮件来自于外部。除非你确定邮件内容安全，否则不要点击任何链接和附件。 CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

 

Hi Alfred,

 

Please add the following CR documents into the queue, it contains 20 editorial CIDs.

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/25/11-25-1791-00-00bn-lb291-editorial-comments-part-1.docx

 

regards

于健 Ross Jian Yu

Huawei Technologies

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1

---

To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBN list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBN&A=1