Hi Bo,
Please note that the text of my SPs has been updated based on offline discussions.
SP1
- Do you agree to add the following text in the TGbp SFD --- 802.11bp shall specify a provisioning protocol, where (1) a PSK is built in a non-AP
AMP STA and obtained by an AMP AP using an OOB method for mutual authentication between them; and (2) there are two options based on the non-AP AMP STA’s device capability: (a) both the AMP AP and the non-AP AMP STA generate/update a PMK from the PSK using
parameters specified by the AMP AP, or (b) the non-AP AMP STA generates/updates a PMK and sends the PMK to the AMP AP in encrypted form using an encryption key established after PSK-based mutual authentication?
- Note:
- Whether to include mono-static backscatter non-AP STAs in this method is TBD.
- Reference: 11-25/1437, 11-25/1086, 11-25/0819.
SP2
- Do you agree to add the following text in the TGbp SFD --- 802.11bp shall specify an optional data field identifying a PMK ID and an AMP AP ID
in the first authentication message in which the AMP AP sends ANonce to an AMP non-AP STA, such that the AMP non-AP STA can derive a PMK for secure communication with the AMP AP from a pre-configured PMK identified by the PMK ID for scalability purpose?
- Note:
- The secure AMP communication method is defined in Motion 64, 65, 66.
- Whether to include mono-static backscatter non-AP STAs in this method is TBD.
- Reference: 11-25/1437, 11-25/1086, 11-25/0831.
Thanks,
Hui
From: sun.bo1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <sun.bo1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, November 8, 2025 2:51 PM
To: STDS-802-11-TGBP@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [STDS-802-11-TGBP] Tentative TGbp agenda for Nov plenary session is uploaded and some clarification
|
Caution: This
e-mail originated outside Infineon Technologies. Please be cautious when sharing information or opening attachments especially from unknown senders. Refer to our intranet
guide to help you identify Phishing email.
|
Thanks very much to those who have sent the agenda item requests for submissions or SPs in the reflector.
I have incorporated all the agenda item requests into a tentative agenda (11-25/1774r0) for coming plenary session as in following link, together with the link to an
updated SP deck docment (11-25/1692r6).
As I claimed in last TC, there will be a SP/MOTION slot in our first meeting (PM1, Monday). I'd like to clarify the order of the SPs to be conducted as below:
-
Pending SPs marked with "postponed to f2f meeting" will be conducted first, unless they're claimed deferred/postponed in the reflector before the first meeting.
-
Then the newly added SFD SP will be conducted. There's only one new SFD SP in 11-25/1774r0 from Panpan Li, which I added into SFD PHY SP Set #8 as SP4.
-
Then the PDT SPs will be conducted. There're 3 PDT SPs in 11-25/1774r0.
-
Then the technical motion for SFD SPs will be conducted to approve proposed SFD content in SPs with majority support after Sep interim session.
-
Note-1, the time for SPs in the first meeting will be controlled so that we have enough time to go through PDT submissions. SPs not conducted due to short of time will be postponed to Wednesday
AM2 or later.
-
Note-2, pending SPs marked with "deferred" will NOT return to agenda automatically. You need to send an agenda request for a pending SP marked with "deferred" to the group reflector as
a new SP request (the SP No. and SP Set No. will not be changed).
Please let me know if you have further requests to the agenda, or new requests for submissions and SPs.
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1
|