| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Hi,Alice, Thanks for you careful check. For you first comment, we have already differentiate the 2 data rates with W and W_bar. As I highlighted in below. For 250kbps data rate, the
NAMETBD1 is constructed by the 32-bit sequence
W, where each bit in the sequence is mapped to an OOK symbol of duration
2 µs. For 1 Mbps data rate, the
NAMETBD1 is constructed by the
logical complement of W, where each bit in the sequence is mapped to an OOK symbol of duration 2 µs. For clarify, I will make it more explicitly: For 250kbps data rate, the NAMETBD1 is constructed by the 32-bit sequence
W, where each bit in the sequence is mapped to an OOK symbol of duration 2 µs. For 1 Mbps data rate, the
NAMETBD1 is constructed by For you second comment, I will capture it in r2 as in
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/25/11-25-2132-02-00bp-pdt-amp-downlink-synchronization-field.docx BR, weijie 发件人: Alice Jialing Li Chen <jialing.li.phd2@xxxxxxxxx>
Hi Weijie, A few comments to your PDT. In the text below, "W" is used for both 250kbps and 1Mbps. "W_bar" should be used for 1Mbps. Could you please correct it? Also, for clarity purpose, could you please add text explicitly saying that W and W_bar are complementary
sequences?
Could you please change the title of Figure 40-5 to for example, "AMP-Sync field format in a DL AMP PPDU to non-backscatter non-AP STAs or bistatic backscatter non-AP STAs" for clarity? This figure is not applicable to
other transmissions.
Regards, Alice On Wed, Nov 12, 2025 at 2:22 AM
徐伟杰 <00001bc427594473-dmarc-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGBP list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGBP&A=1 |