| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index | 
| --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector --- Hello Dave, Mark and all,
 Thank you for your inputs.
 I have updated doc 22/0398 to incorporate your feedback. See:
https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/dcn/22/11-22-0398-02-000m-proposed-resolution-for-spp-a-msdu-support.docx Note that the update in 22/0398r2 is in the discussion section, no additional change to the proposed change section. Regards, Emily
 From: Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 --- This message came from the IEEE 802.11 Task Group M Technical Reflector ---
 Hello Dave, The answer is not necessarily, since it depends on the setting of the SPP capable and SPP required bits in the RSN capabilities field. As I answered previously, SPP A-MSDU is optional
 for S1G and all other STAs except DMG STAs. If an S1G STA implements A-MSDU then it acts the same as a VHT STA, for example. There is no difference in behavior for S1G STAs vs other non-DMG STAs in this area as far as I can see. OK, thanks.  (I'm not sure why this is, since S1G long postdates the introduction of SPP, which was a last-minute hack because people wanted to rush out 11n D2.0…). So it sounds as if the proposed resolution in 22/0398r1 is correct for S1G STAs too, though the discussion sentence: Note that the “SPP A-MSDU Capable” bit is only for HT STA (non-DMG STA). DMG
STAs always use SPP A-MSDU. is confusing and should be something like: Note that the “SPP A-MSDU Capable” bit is only for non-DMG STAs (e.g. HT STAs and S1G STAs). DMG
STAs always use SPP A-MSDUs. Thanks, Mark --
 Mark RISON, Standards Architect, WLAN   English/Esperanto/Français Samsung Cambridge Solution Centre       Tel: +44 1223  434600 Innovation Park, Cambridge CB4 0DS      Fax: +44 1223  434601 ROYAUME UNI                             WWW:
http://www.samsung.com/uk From: David Goodall <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Hi Mark, On Wed, Mar 16, 2022 at 6:21 PM Mark Rison <m.rison@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: 
 The answer is not necessarily, since it depends on the setting of the SPP capable and SPP required bits in the RSN capabilities field. As I answered previously, SPP A-MSDU is optional
 for S1G and all other STAs except DMG STAs. If an S1G STA implements A-MSDU then it acts the same as a VHT STA, for example. There is no difference in behavior for S1G STAs vs other non-DMG STAs in this area as far as I can see.   
 Yes, the behavior is the same as for any non-DMG STA.   
 The original 802.11ah-2016 text did specifically reference HT STAs but that seems to have been removed in the latest 802.11me draft. What part of the current 802.11me draft are you
 referring to? - Dave   
 
 
 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: 
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1  To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-11-TGM list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-11-TGM&A=1 |