CommentID~CommenterName~CommenterEmail~CommenterPhone~CommenterFax~CommenterCo~Clause~Subclause~Page~Line~CommentType~Comment~SuggestedRemedy~Response~CommentStatus~ResponseStatus
0~Hayes, Vic~vichayes@agere.com~+31 30 609 7528~+31 30 609 7498~Agere Systems~00~Introduction~~10~E~The sentence only refers to a single working group. Because this document is being reviewed by 2 working groups, we need to list both lists.Also the term "At the time this standard was completed," is ambiguous: is that time when the standard is sent to sponsor or when sent to revcom?~Change "working group" into "working groups" and change "this standard was completed" into "this standard approved for submission to Sponsor Ballot"~~X~O
0~Hayes, Vic~vichayes@agere.com~+31 30 609 7528~+31 30 609 7498~Agere Systems~03~3.1.2~3~16~T~The definition of coexistence is not giving a clear picture as to the impact to the pain it would cause. Currently, the reader could assume that neither system is being impacted in performance~Add appropriate text to the definition, such as adding at th eend of the sentence "while the systems are not more degraded then 1/n th of the total of systems operating together compared to operating autonomously".~~X~O
0~Hayes, Vic~vichayes@agere.com~+31 30 609 7528~+31 30 609 7498~Agere Systems~10~10.2.1~43~36~T~The word "shall" is not appropriate in a Recommended Practice, especially in the area dealing with service primitives, which is supposed to be infomal anyway.~Replace "shall" by "should"~~X~O
