CommentID~CommenterName~CommenterEmail~CommenterPhone~CommenterFax~CommenterCo~Clause~Subclause~Page~Line~CommentType~Comment~SuggestedRemedy~Response~CommentStatus~ResponseStatus
0~Jones, VK~vkjones@woodsidenet.com~650.475.1915~650.475.1915~Woodside Networks~10~10.4~58~10-25~TR~Using a notch filter to remove the interference effects of an 802.15.1 signal from an 802.11b signal will work if the interference location is static through the entire 802.11b packet (which it is not since it hops 160 times in 100ms).  Otherwise, changing the location of the notch filter as the 802.15.1 interference hops will create what looks like a time-varying channel response to the 802.11b packet.  This type of channel behavior would necessitate the use of an advanced equalization method.~Remove the recommended practice of using spectral excision for PHY layer coexistence.~~X~O
0~Jones, VK~vkjones@woodsidenet.com~650.475.1915~650.475.1915~Woodside Networks~10~10.2~42~12-18~TR~How is AWMA coordinated with probable enhancements of fair-queuing in WLAN, such as HCF and EDCF, where time division of the beacon interval is used for QOS reasons.  Have the mechanisms of HCF been studied when used in conjunction with AWMA?~Remove AWMA recommended practice.~~X~O