CommentID~CommenterName~CommenterEmail~CommenterPhone~CommenterFax~CommenterCo~Clause~Subclause~Page~Line~CommentType~Comment~SuggestedRemedy~Response~CommentStatus~ResponseStatus
0~McClellan, Kelly~kpm@valencesemi.com~949-428-4157~714-501-6874~Valence Semiconductor~01~1.0~1~52~E~Scope (coexistence of .11b & .15.1) not consistently applied; 802.11 used in place of 802.11b when referring to PHY. This occurs in other clauses as well (see note in Remedy).~Change "802.11" to "802.11b" [multiple places] ***also in: (subclause,page,line) 4.1,6,23 4.2,8,28 4.4,9,28 5.4.4,28,32 6.2,30,5 9.,34,5 10.1,41,10 10.1,41,25 10.2,42,12 10.2.4,50,20 10.2.4,50,22 10.2.4,50,24 10.2.4,50,25 10.3.2,52,7 10.3.2,52,24 11.,61,26 11.,61,28 11.,61,33~~X~O
0~McClellan, Kelly~kpm@valencesemi.com~949-428-4157~714-501-6874~Valence Semiconductor~01~1.1~2~7~E~Editor's note is not consistent with document. 2Mbps is included in 5.3.6.3 and 5.4.3 Figure 10.~Remove editor's note (all of line 7).~~X~O
0~McClellan, Kelly~kpm@valencesemi.com~949-428-4157~714-501-6874~Valence Semiconductor~01~1.2~2~21~E~Typographical error.~replace "802.119" with "802.11b"~~X~O
0~McClellan, Kelly~kpm@valencesemi.com~949-428-4157~714-501-6874~Valence Semiconductor~04~4.1~6~28~E~Statement on scope is under descriptions, and is inconsistent.  PCF is part of Table 24, and subclause 10.2 (as Access Point / beacon) as well as other places in the document.~Remove the sentence starting with: "The scope of this document is limited to DCF"~~X~O
0~McClellan, Kelly~kpm@valencesemi.com~949-428-4157~714-501-6874~Valence Semiconductor~04~4.1.3~7~47~T~802.11 FH is not in the scope of the RP.~Remove subclause 4.1.3, "IEEE 802.15.1 in the presence of an IEEE 802.11 frequency hopping interferer"~~X~O
0~McClellan, Kelly~kpm@valencesemi.com~949-428-4157~714-501-6874~Valence Semiconductor~09~9.3~38~21~T~802.11 FH is not in the scope of the RP.~Remove subclause 9.3, "802.11 1 Mbit/s frequency hopping and IEEE 802.15.1 interference"~~X~O
0~McClellan, Kelly~kpm@valencesemi.com~949-428-4157~714-501-6874~Valence Semiconductor~05~5.4.2~21~6~T~2Mbps DSSS system model missing; results presented in 5.4.3 include 2Mbps but there is no discussion of the 2Mbps model. Also, the 5.4.2 introduction section is a little confusing; it doesn't mention the 5.5Mbps model in 5.4.2.2.~In 5.4.2: 1) clarify that only the 5.4.4 results are limited to 1 & 11Mbps 2) add a reference to the 5.5Mbps model 3) add a new subclause for the 2Mbps model and a reference to it in the intro~~X~O