CommentID~CommenterName~CommenterEmail~CommenterPhone~CommenterFax~CommenterCo~Clause~Subclause~Page~Line~CommentType~Comment~SuggestedRemedy~Response~CommentStatus~ResponseStatus
0~Oakes, Ivan~ifo@tality.com~+44 1223 421 025~-~Tality (UK) Ltd~00~0~1~1~E~PDF bookmarks could do with being reduced in number!~Set up boomarks!~~X~O
0~Oakes, Ivan~ifo@tality.com~+44 1223 421 025~-~Tality (UK) Ltd~01~1.1~8~1~E~scope "limited to coexistence of IEEE Std 802.11b-1999 Wireless Local Area Net-works (WLAN) and IEEE Std 802.15.1 Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPAN)" is inconsistent with document title "Coexistence of Wireles Personal Area Networks with _Other_ Wireless Devices Operating in Unlicensed Frequency _Bands_."~Change title to "Coexistence of Wireles Personal Area Networks with  Wireless LAN Devices Operating in 2.4GHz Unlicensed Frequency Bands."~~X~O
0~Oakes, Ivan~ifo@tality.com~+44 1223 421 025~-~Tality (UK) Ltd~01~1.2~8~12~E~Use of "project"?~Replace "project" with "this recommended practice"~~X~O
0~Oakes, Ivan~ifo@tality.com~+44 1223 421 025~-~Tality (UK) Ltd~01~1.2~8~21~E~typo "802.119"~Reacled "802.119" with "802.11b"~~X~O
0~Oakes, Ivan~ifo@tality.com~+44 1223 421 025~-~Tality (UK) Ltd~10~10.2.4~56~28~T~"allows any other Access Point" implies that this node is an AP.  I don't this is the most likely scenario.  A co-loctaed STa-BT device seems more likely.~remove the word "other" so implying that STAs may also send CTS to reserve the channel for WPLAN.~~X~O
0~Oakes, Ivan~ifo@tality.com~+44 1223 421 025~-~Tality (UK) Ltd~10~10.2~~~T~It is unclear what will happen if there is more than one AP(or perhaps STA) reserving WPAN intervals.~It may be desirable to have a method to synchonise the WLAN intervals and so WPAN intervals to allow meaningful 802.15.1 transmissions perhaps by sychronisation of TBTT's between BSS's?~~X~O
