CommentID~CommenterName~CommenterEmail~CommenterPhone~CommenterFax~CommenterCo~Clause~Subclause~Page~Line~CommentType~Comment~SuggestedRemedy~Response~CommentStatus~ResponseStatus
0~Paine, Richard H.~richard.h.paine@boeing.com~425-865-4921~206-854-8199~Boeing~09~9.2~36~23~T~There is a missing analysis in this section.  The campus-wide ubiquitous coverage deployment of 802.11b (at least b, if not 802.11 1Mbps DSSS and 802.11 2Mbps DSSS) is not addressed and needs to be.  Ubiqitous coverage campuses in enterprises like Boeing and Microsoft are becoming commonplace.  This continuous non-collaborative environment includes the need to use 802.11b channelization for alternating cells.  Take the instance of several ubiquitous-coverage 802.11b Boeing campuses - overlapping cells are the norm and full channelization is in effect in those campuses that have ubiquitous coverage.  The analysis of this environment with bleeding between cells needs to be in the document or its value is diminished.  What is the recommended practice for the campus ubiquitous coverage environment.  In addition, consider the conference room.  In that conference room with perhaps 30 people, with a mix of Bluetooth and 802.11b, what studies have been done to show and model the effects of the dense use of 2.4GHz radios. What is the recommended practice for the conference room model?  Also consider the effects of being on an airplane and half of the airplane's passengers use mobile computing devices with half of those using Bluetooth and half using 802.11b.~Charts and text to reflect the ubiquitous coverage and the density issues in the interference in the non-collaborative environment.~~X~O
