Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: [STDS-802-16] Does a private scheduler need to GPSS (Grant Per Subscriber Station) ?

To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: Re: [STDS-802-16] Does a private scheduler need to GPSS (Grant Per Subscriber Station) ?
From: Itzik Kitroser <itzikk@RUNCOM.CO.IL>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:25:54 +0200
In-Reply-To: <200603020812.k228CZYi028290@hormel9.ieee.org>
Reply-To: Itzik Kitroser <itzikk@RUNCOM.CO.IL>
Thread-Index: AcY90P91Pbs2eFfBSvi0AD8reDnR8wAAbxTg

Because it's not in the standard.

Also, try to read back on this mailing list, you will find more detailed answer.

Itzik.

From: Sang-Jin Kim [mailto:ksjsc@POSTECH.AC.KR]
Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 10:12 AM
To: STDS-802-16@listserv.ieee.org
Subject: [STDS-802-16] Does a private scheduler need to GPSS (Grant Per Subscriber Station) ?

Hi.

I wonder if a private scheduler need to GPSS mode.

Why does not a scheduler of GPC (Grant Per Connection) use?

Thanks,

Sang-Jin Kim

References:
- [STDS-802-16] Does a private scheduler need to GPSS (Grant Per Subscriber Station) ?
  - From: Sang-Jin Kim <ksjsc@POSTECH.AC.KR>

Prev by Date: [STDS-802-16] IEEE 802.16 WG Secretary position
Next by Date: [STDS-802-16] Does a private scheduler need to GPSS (Grant Per Subscriber Station) ?
Prev by thread: [STDS-802-16] Does a private scheduler need to GPSS (Grant Per Subscriber Station) ?
Next by thread: [STDS-802-16] Fwd: Last Chance for IEEE 802 Session Registration on the Web and Rooms
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread