|
Dear Enhui Liu,
It is always best if a non-voter that has an
important comment can (1) attend a Working Group meeting and present a strong
case for your comment, and (2) find a voting member to strongly support that
comment and submit it. In the absence of finding such a supporter, the
next best procedure is to find any voting member to submit the comment.
Some of the IEEE 802 groups designate a voting
member to collect input from non-voters and submit those comments as there
own. Such submission guarantees that the contributions are reviewed by the
Working Group. I volunteer to do that for your contribution. Let me
suggest that I believe the best way of submitting such a comment would be to
state:
Problem Statement:
In Clause 11 the Wrap function is not properly
implemented.
Proposed Solution:
Using the Huawei contribution posted in Enhui Li's
December 10 email "[RPRWG] Propose the Amendment to Draft P802.17/D1.1 from
Huawei",
1) Incorporate the functions specified in the
draft's section "Replace the 11.7.3 with the following:" into Draft 2.0 Clause
11.8.3. In addition, align the state machine presented in Table 11.5 with
Table 11.6 in the proposed amendment.
If you would like me to submit this comment please
send me an email stating that you would like me to do that. If you have
proposed changes to the way the comment is submitted, please let me know that as
well.
Best regards,
Robert D. Love President, Resilient Packet Ring Alliance President,
LAN Connect Consultants 7105 Leveret Circle Raleigh,
NC 27615 Phone: 919 848-6773 Mobile: 919
810-7816 email: rdlove@xxxxxxxx
Fax: 208 978-1187
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 9:05
PM
Subject: Re: [RPRWG] Propose the
Amendment to Draft P802.17/D1.1 from Huawei
Dear President Love,
Thank for your instruction about the strict procedure.
Sorry, we don't intent to break the WG's rules and rights.We just want to give some helpful comments to improve
the 802.17 draft, but obviously we take the wrong way.It's difficult and costly to us to attend the January interim
meeting.
Do only members have the right to post comments to the draft
on the 802.17 website? How to give comments as an
individual?
Regards,
Liu Enhui
Li Jian
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 11:00
PM
Subject: Re: [RPRWG] Propose the Amendment
to Draft P802.17/D1.1 from Huawei
To:
Liu Enhui and
Li Jian
First I want to thank you and your team for continuing to look
into ways to improve the 802.17 draft. In addition, I want to address
the procedural issues surrounding your request to have your proposal
reviewed, and then to receive a response on that review. I am
addressing these issues for your benefit, and for the benefit of others that
may have ideas on improving the 802.17 draft and are not certain on the best
way to proceed to get their comments seriously considered.
All changes to the draft will be made as a result of resolving ballot
comments. Any balloters that support your proposal are free to point
to sections of the draft they believe are currently deficient or wrong, and
suggest your draft, or some modification of it as replacement text. In
addition, if any of the Ad Hoc groups embraces your proposal they may take
it and possibly enhance it, and then present it as their collective
proposal, in addition to referencing the proposal in their ballot comments
on the draft.
There is no individual or sub-group that has the right to express the
views of the working group on a proposal that the working group has not
reviewed and commented on by way of a formal motion.
Finally, one additional action that you can take to enhance the
likelihood that your proposal will be carefully considered is to come to the
January interim meeting and make a formal presentation on your proposal,
explaining why it is necessary and what the resultant benefits are.
This final step should be in addition to having someone submit a ballot
comment recommending the adoption of your proposal.
Note, details on registering for the January interim meeting, including
making hotel reservations, are posted on
Best regards,
Robert D. Love President, Resilient Packet Ring
Alliance President, LAN Connect Consultants 7105 Leveret
Circle Raleigh, NC 27615 Phone: 919
848-6773 Mobile: 919 810-7816 email:
rdlove@xxxxxxxx
Fax: 208 978-1187
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2002 9:24
PM
Subject: [RPRWG] Propose the
Amendment to Draft P802.17/D1.1 from Huawei
Hi, all,
Our team have some comments on draft
P802.17/D1.1.
Maybe Draft 2.0 will be released soon, but I think this
still will be significant.
Please review and answer it. Thank you very
much.
Introduction to the attached
proposal：
In the IEEE802.17 Draft D1.1, there are
two kinds of wrap mode i.e. center wrap and edge wrap. Under the center
wrap mode, the both sides of one station should make wrapping
simultaneously, or there will be a wrong mode that will lead to packets
lost. And normally for the two sides of one station, the state diagram are
being executed independently and in parallel. So there should been a lot
of communication between two sides. So we give a detail implement of state
diagram based on upon condition, including clear message sending and
receiving between two sides of one station.
Regards,
Liu Enhui
Li Jian
Huawei technologies
CO.,LTD.
|