| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
John
That is correct.
PSM4 was first introduced in bm, as were other solutions for SMF 100G point-to-point. At the time, our interpretation of Broad Market Potential was that there can only be one solution for SMF. Because there was genuine justification for multiple ones, bm did
not adopt any new one.
This resulted in 100G PSM4 and 100G CWDM4 standardization in MSAs right after the project.
The bs project recognized need for multiple solutions, which established the paradigm we have today of DRn, FRn, and LRn. Break-out application was recognized as a possible use of DRn, although not explicitly specified.
Chris
From: John D'Ambrosia <jdambrosia@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2026 3:24 AM To: Chris Cole <chris.cole@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: STDS-802-3-400GPL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <STDS-802-3-400GPL@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [802.3_400GPL] [400GPL] Website updates Chris
400GBASE-DR4 for PSM4 was defined in 802.3bs- not the 100G project as noted below.
500m was selected at the time due to concerns on closing the budget for 2km.
i’m glad to see the notion of breakout included in the 802.3dj standard.
john
Sent from my iPhone
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-400GPL list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-400GPL&A=1 |