| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Frank – totally appropriate to take this out of the EZ bucket. I would like to point out that we try to name the specific states that a requirement applies to rather than say “following the “X” state”, because
“following the “X” state” implies that the state diagram is a one-time through, linear process. They generally are not. If the state diagram can recycle, it isn’t clear what happens when you recycle, since you have already been through that state… You can
make it clear – but it takes more words. We assume that the sense of ‘following’ is reset when the diagram recycles, say, for instance, to the SILENT state, but that isn’t always the case. There are things you want to do only on the first pass through. In clause 149, this particular language is descriptive, and isn’t a requirement – so you don’t really need to be as precise with it, but it still isn’t quite correct, both from the aspect above, and even in
light of the state diagrams. The language ‘following’ here isn’t quite correct (and it isn’t correct in clause 149) – as the PCS_DATA state follows the TRAINING (or TRAINING1) states, but does not exhibit the same behavior. (it returns
to transmit disable) George Zimmerman, Ph.D. President & Principal CME Consulting, Inc. Experts in Advanced PHYsical Communications 310-920-3860 From: Natalie Wienckowski <natalie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Frank, I have moved comment #150 out of the EZ bucket. On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 6:59 AM Frank Wang (王順生) <frank.wang@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link:
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1 To unsubscribe from the STDS-802-3-ISAAC list, click the following link: https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=STDS-802-3-ISAAC&A=1 |