| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Dear colleagues, According to the call discussion on Monday, we think it would be good to bring the questions to the list and ask for more
review and comments.
1.
Ask for review on Ethernet Link OAM module Based on feedbacks from July meeting, we have prepared a mapping table between Ethernet Link OAM module and managed objects/attributes
from 802.3 Clause 30, together with some texts which is mainly based on what we have in IEEE 802.3.1 spec. Also, the ELO module itself has some changes when doing the review, which is stated in the update document. The revised documents based on feedback yesterday have been uploaded at
http://www.ieee802.org/3/cf/public/adhoc/index.html, please take a look and share your comments to improve it.
2.
Plan on the NMDA work As you might know, IETF has started the NMDA work which affects how we modeling YANG modules.
As for now, the revised ietf-interface module(rfc7223bis) has been submitted at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis/ , also the guideline for YANG modeling (rfc6087bis) is on the way at
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-13 . We plan to head to NMDA and would like to discuss how to move this work forward. The detailed information can be found at
http://www.ieee802.org/3/cf/public/adhoc/NMDA%20discussion.pdf, in which 3 options are discussed:
·
Change to NMDA style during Task Force stage (D1.x)
·
Change to NMDA style during WG ballot (D2.x)
·
Leave the NMDA work to future maintenance. Please feel free to share your thoughts and comments on the topics above. They will be discussed and hopefully approved in Charlotte. Thank you very much. Best Regards, Yan |