Re: [STDS-802-Privacy] Updated Privacy Recommendation PAR-CSD proposal
Hi Juan Carlos,
Some thoughts:
Slide 5 and Slide 7 + 12 - In slide 5 you use “protect” and in slide 7 + 12 you use “mitigate” - perhaps it would be useful to select one word for consistency throughout the slide deck
Slide 6 - re purpose - Will you only be developing recommendations for standards developers? Or will you also make recommendations for implementers/deployers? (e.g. when deploying x, the better practice is y)
(Actually, I see you say implementers in slide 15, so you might want to adjust slide 6 to match)
Slide 7 - I think you mean “there have been recent concerns about threats to Internet privacy …” Also, I am not sure whether it is appropriate to call for action by IETF and W3C in an IEEE PAR.
Slide 15 - For the audience, do you need to say "IETF Informational RFCs”?
regards,
Christine
Christine Runnegar
Internet Society
> On 28 May 2015, at 12:21 am, Zuniga, Juan Carlos <JuanCarlos.Zuniga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have updated the PAR/CSD proposal, trying to address all comments that were received during (or before) the Berlin IEEE 802 meeting.
>
> Please take a look at the new contribution and send any comments you might have to the mailing list:
>
> https://mentor.ieee.org/privecsg/dcn/15/privecsg-15-0004-03-0000-privacy-recommendation-par-csd-proposal.pptx
>
> We will discuss the PAR/CSD proposal at the upcoming teleconference on 3 June (10:00 AM ET), with the intention to pre-circulate it to the 802 EC in preparation for July’s 802 plenary meeting.
>
> Regards,
>
> Juan Carlos Zuniga
> (IEEE 802 Privacy EC SG Chair)